Physics Van 3-site Navigational Menu

Physics Van Navigational Menu

Q & A: Antiphotons?

Learn more physics!

Most recent answer: 06/09/2014
Q:
Are there such things as anti-photons. And if there is, what would happen if it collided with a photon? Thank you
cheater click wifes who cheat
the best android phone link phone tracking apps
married woman looking to cheat go most women cheat
best android spy spy on mobile how to spy on an android phone
finasteride sigridw.com cialis 80mg
free online coupons pharmacy coupon new prescription coupons
imitrex 50mg thyroxine flagyl 200mg
prescriptions coupons markthrice.com discount coupon for viagra
1 wk pregnant abortion pill article on abortion
viagra bestellen online viagra pillen kruidvat pillen kopen
lilly cialis coupon coupons for prescriptions coupons prescriptions
augmentin générique arbot.cz augmentin sirop
motilium enceinte site motilium et grossesse
singulair 4 mg granulat scottdangelo.com singulair patient information
cialis coupon card coupon prescription cialis coupon

- Matthew Ervin (age 16)
A:
Hi Matthew,

The short answer to "are there anti-photons" is "yes", but the disappointment here is that anti-photons and photons are the same particles. Some particles are their own antiparticles, notably the force carriers like photons, the Z boson, and gluons, which mediate the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong force, respectively. Particles that are their own antiparticles must be electrically neutral, because an aniparticle has the opposite electrical charge as its partner particle. Other things must also be zero, like the number of quarks. A neutron cannot be its own antiparticle because it is made up of quarks and an antineutron is made up of antiquarks. A pi_0 is made up of a quark and an antiquark and is in fact its own antiparticle also.

You can find lots out about particles at , part of the Particle Data Group's .

You also ask, in a follow-up question:

I have just thought of some stuff to add to my other question. When the antiphoton and photon collide, would they fuse? And if so, would they form a particle that has mass, or one that is massless. And what kind of particle is it?

The answer is yes, photons may collide and produce other particles. One familiar reaction is the low-energy annihilation of an electron and an anti-electron (known as a positron)-- the result is usually a pair of photons (sometimes you get more than two). You need at least two, in order to conserve both energy and momentum. This reaction also works in reverse -- a pair of photons may collide to make an electron-positron pair. This happens all the time in particle physics experiments.

In high-energy electron-positron collisons, often what collides are not the electrons or the positrons, but the photons in the "entourage" around the beam electrons and positrons. These photons come together with enough energy to produce a pair of particles like an electron and a positron, a muon and an antimuon, or some quarks, depending on how much energy is available. The quarks may have lots of energy to pull on the strong force holding them together so that they may produce jets of subatomic particles.

These collisions also happen in proton-antiproton collisions at high energy. The protons and antiprotons also have a cloud of photons around them which may interact with the photons in the opposite beam to produce pairs of particles which may be observed in a detector. The energies of the photons has to be really high, however.

For low-energy photons (like visible light, radio waves, x-rays and just about anything outside of a high-energy physics laboratory), photons for the most part just go right past each other. This is because the equations of electricity and magnetism are "linear" -- the local field strentgths of two electromagnetic waves colliding is just the sum of the two, with no interaction. It works just like waves on a pond -- they will pass through each other without interacting. There is a very tiny effect, called "light-on-light scattering", where, with a very low probability, a photon will "bounce off" of another one. This proceeds by exchanging a virtual electron around in a loop. The resulting photons are massless just like the incoming ones. So if you ask if photons when they collide make massive or massless particles, the answer is: they can make either, but the mass of the whole system (that is, the total energy in a frame in which the total momentum is zero) is the same before and after the collision.

Back to high-energy collisions: There are ideas floating around the high-energy physics community to build a "photon collider" out of an electron-positron collider. This can be done by focusing laser light head on on a beam of very high-energy electrons. The photons which bounce backwards from the electrons will have very high energies, taking a large fraction of the electron's energy. The same can be done pointing in the opposite direction, and the beams of high-energy photons can be brought into collision. This is proposed to study the production of, for example, Higgs bosons, which can be made in this way via loops of W bosons and top quarks.

You can do a search on Google for "photon collider" -- there is quite a lot of information available. You can ask us more questions about anything that sounds weird.

Tom
married woman looking to cheat married men that cheat most women cheat
best android spy spy on mobile how to spy on an android phone
married cheaters site dating for married men
coupons rx prostudiousa.com www.januvia.com coupons
imitrex 50mg thepoliticalsword.com flagyl 200mg
online discount pharmacy viagra coupons and discounts coupon for prescription
new prescription coupon discount drug coupons prescription coupon card
manufacturer coupons for prescription drugs viagra 2016 coupon coupon prescription
viagra bestellen online viagra pillen kruidvat pillen kopen
cialis coupons from lilly coupon for free cialis coupons for prescriptions
coupons for prescriptions open drug prescription card
discount prescription drug cards cialis online coupon prescription discounts cards
discount prescription drug cards cialis online coupon prescription discounts cards
venlafaxine gewichtstoename idippedut.dk venlafaxine fk
champix alkohol mdwguide.com champix
cefdinir red stool ski-club-auringen.de cefdinir nedir
nurofen cold and flu dosage internetsellout.com nurofen plus dosage
cialis coupon card coupon prescription cialis coupon
vivitrol alcohol what is vivitrol shot narcan challenge
vivitrol alcohol what is vivitrol shot narcan challenge

(published on 10/22/2007)

Follow-Up #1: Are neutrinos their own anti-particles?

Q:
Quote: "Particles that are their own antiparticles must be electrically neutral, because an antiparticle has the opposite electrical charge as its partner particle." like photon, Neutrino is electrically neutral (although they might not be force carriers like photons). but we have particles called anti-neutrinos. are neutrino and anti-neutrino one and the same?
hillcrest abortion clinic stories of abortion live abortion video
the best android phone mealmixer.com phone tracking apps
types of abortions the weeks of pregnancy what happens when you get an abortion
buy sildenafil 100mg viagra without a doctor prescription viagra 100 mg
discount card prescription damske.com print cvs
discount card prescription damske.com print cvs
coupons rx prostudiousa.com www.januvia.com coupons
viagra coupons free softballspa.com drug coupons
can i take minocycline with birth control can i take minocycline with birth control can i take minocycline with birth control
can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone
lisinopril and bisoprolol lisinopriland.net lisinopril and bisoprolol
lisinopril and bisoprolol lisinopriland.net lisinopril and bisoprolol
prescription drug coupons prescription discount coupon drug coupon
cialis coupon card read cialis coupons from manufacturer
augmentin générique arbot.cz augmentin sirop
fusidinezuur kopen blog.jp-sa.org fusidic acid
buscopan hund go buscopan dragees

- An (age 17)
India
A:
Hello An,
This is a very interesting, and fundamental, question. In order for a particle to be its own anti-particle it must be invariant under the three simultaneous operations, Charge Conjugation, Parity Inversion, and Time Inversion.  The CPT theorem (that physics as a whole is invariant under this operation) is one of the tenets of modern field theory.  No experiment has proven it wrong.   Even though some particles may violate P or C the combination of CPT always turns out to be invariant.
 
 As you pointed out in a previous question any charged particle cannot be its own anti-particle since under the operation of charge conjugation the sign of the electric charge  is reversed.   Neutral bosons (integer spin particles) can be their own anti-particles, for example the photon and presumably the graviton, but not necessarily if there is an additional associated quantum number.   The neutral K meson is an example of the latter since it has a quantum number, called strangeness, that is not charge conjugate invariant. 

Back to neutrinos.   If the neutrino has mass, which we now believe it does, then it has the capability of having a magnetic moment.  If so, then it cannot be its own anti-particle because, like electric charge, the magnetic moment changes sign under the operation of charge conjugation.  If the mass of the neutrino were zero then the anti-neutrino could in principle be its own anti-particle.  There is a complete theory of this type of particle, called a Majorana neutrino (See:) that describes this possibility.   So far, no experimental evidence for these particles have been found, the absence of neutrino-less double beta decay being the best test.

Even if the ordinary Dirac-type neutrinos have mass, but no magnetic moment, then they can be their own anti-neutrino.  Lowest order calculations using minimal extensions to the Standard Model give a moment value of the order of 10-20 times that of the electron's Bohr magneton.   Several experiments have set upper limits of around 10-11 or so.  We have to improve our experimental limits by quite a bit before we will know the answer.
See:


LeeH
why people cheat marriage affairs how many people cheat
internet drug coupons site prescription coupon
married men cheat with men women that cheat with married men wifes cheat
abortion pill clinics abortion pill prices for abortions
married cheaters redsoctober.com dating for married men
married cheaters site dating for married men
buy sildenafil 100mg buy sildenafil 100mg viagra 100 mg
rite aid prescription transfer coupon mesutcakir.com.tr coupon rite aid
viagra coupons free softballspa.com drug coupons
viagra coupon card blog.brunothalmann.com viagra free coupon
1 wk pregnant d&c dilation and curettage article on abortion
lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks
diabetes affect sexuality open diabetes sexuality treatment
viagra bestellen online viagra pillen kruidvat pillen kopen
coupons for prescriptions discount prescription coupons drug prescription card
voltaren ára go voltaren
buscopan hund buscopan wirkung buscopan dragees
voltaren retard voltaren pomada voltaren spray
prescriptions coupons cialis coupon drug prescription card
how expensive is an abortion abortion clinic abortion clinics dallas tx
how expensive is an abortion abortion clinic abortion clinics dallas tx

(published on 02/05/2011)

Follow-Up #2: does a photon stay the same?

Q:
When shooting a photon through a double-slit experiment, is it that same photon that actually hits the detector? I'm curious about the interaction of that photon and the quantum fluctuations that occur in a vacuum. Assuming Pilot Wave theory, where the uncertainty isn't a fundamental property of reality, is it possible that your initial photon interacts with virtual particles? Possibly getting annihilated by one, allowing the surviving anti-photon (see http://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=1153) to continue on? Could these fluctuations then be part of the Pilot Wave? My thought process. If Hawking Radiation can take advantage of virtual particles, can we apply this to other observable phenomena?
hillcrest abortion clinic site live abortion video
internet drug coupons open prescription coupon
married men cheat with men why husbands cheat wifes cheat
coupons prescriptions prescription savings cards manufacturer coupons for prescription drugs
manufacturer coupons for prescription drugs online viagra coupons coupon prescription
can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone
acheter viagra pas acheter viagra pas acheter viagra pas
cialis coupons from lilly prescription drug cards coupons for prescriptions
prescription drug coupons prescription discount coupon drug coupon
cialis coupon card read cialis coupons from manufacturer
drug discount coupons link discount coupons for prescriptions
discount prescription drug cards cialis online coupon prescription discounts cards
venlafaxine gewichtstoename idippedut.dk venlafaxine fk
augmentin générique arbot.cz augmentin sirop
naprosyn roche rileytech.net naprosyn nedir
naprosyn roche naprosyn wiki naprosyn nedir
diflucan 150 site diflucan sirup
proscar vs propecia for hair loss read proscar pris
buscopan hund go buscopan dragees
lasix injetavel lasix lasix
voltaren retard voltaren pomada voltaren spray
vivitrol alcohol what is vivitrol shot narcan challenge

- Joe Esposito (age 28)
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
A:

The sea of virtual photons in the quantum vacuum doesn't affect the real photon propagation. Perhaps photons are affected by the sea of virtual particles of some deeper type, sort of as quarks are affected by the Higgs field. But in that case the thing we call a photon would already be an object that included the interactions.

You ask if the initial photon could annihilate and be replaced with a different one. I believe that that process would have no symptoms whatsoever, even in principle. Therefore I think that the question has no meaning. We all often stumble into questions like that when we take try to picture quantum processes in classical terms. Classically, no matter how similar two particles are they are in some subtle way not identical. Yet quantum particles of the same type truly are identical, so it doesn't mean anything to say that one is "new".

I'm not positive what change a pilot-wave (Bohm) interpretation would make for the discussion.  

Mike W.

cheater read wifes who cheat
cheater what to do when husband cheats wifes who cheat
hillcrest abortion clinic stories of abortion live abortion video
the best android phone link phone tracking apps
best android spy apps to spy on phones how to spy on an android phone
best android spy apps to spy on phones how to spy on an android phone
buy sildenafil 100mg buy sildenafil 100mg viagra 100 mg
buy sildenafil 100mg viagra without a doctor prescription viagra 100 mg
discount card prescription go print cvs
priligy 30mg click cialis 40mg
ventolin 2mg bistromc.org deltasone 40mg
new prescription coupon discount drug coupons prescription coupon card
viagra coupons free softballspa.com drug coupons
pfizer coupons for viagra viagra coupon viagra discounts coupons
1 wk pregnant abortion pill article on abortion
can i take minocycline with birth control can i take minocycline with birth control can i take minocycline with birth control
cialis dosage and go cialis dose for copd pts
cialis manufacturer coupon cialis discounts coupons prescription drug coupons
cialis manufacturer coupon link prescription drug coupons
cialis coupon lilly coupons for cialis printable transfer prescription coupon
coupons for prescriptions open drug prescription card
claritinekombo warpedfish.co.uk claritine za psa
champix alkohol go champix
cefdinir red stool ski-club-auringen.de cefdinir nedir
amlodipine 5 mg link amlodipine accord
how expensive is an abortion link abortion clinics dallas tx

(published on 01/02/2014)

Follow-Up #3: how does a pilot wave work?

Q:
Thank you for answering, Mike! > Perhaps photons are affected by the sea of virtual particles of some deeper type, sort of as quarks are affected by the Higgs field. But in that case the thing we call a photon would already be an object that included the interactions. Gotcha. That's an interesting thing to think about. > I believe that that process would have no symptoms whatsoever, even in principle. I ask because I wonder if this could give insight to the _mechanism_ of the interference pattern we see. We know there's a sea of virtual photons, so perhaps that could be a hint of something more fundamental rather than pure mathematics. In other words, I was wondering because if the math does allow for this kind of interaction, it could be a clue that these virtual particles and what we're calling the "pilot wave" may be more closely related. Specifically, the virtual particles could have been what is deterministically guiding the photon to its seemingly-random final destination on the detector, similar to what the description of the pilot wave. > I'm not positive what change a pilot-wave (Bohm) interpretation would make for the discussion. It's because when you instead assert that particles still exist even when you aren't observing them, you can start to talk about what happens between the initial and final locations. "In de BroglieBohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory that passes through exactly one of the slits." If we assumed the Copenhagen interpretation, then you're right, my question would be meaningless. Yet you said "The sea of virtual photons in the quantum vacuum doesn't affect the real photon propagation," so my question is false. So in the case of Hawking Radiation, what happens to the virtual particle whose pair gets lots in the black hole? Does it get promoted to a real photon and can then interact with other real photons? Or does it instead drift on forever without ever interacting? (Or perhaps get annihilated by other virtual photon pairs, ad infinitum?)
internet drug coupons coupons for prescription medications prescription coupon
types of abortions site what happens when you get an abortion
discount card prescription go print cvs
rite aid prescription transfer coupon mesutcakir.com.tr coupon rite aid
rite aid prescription transfer coupon open coupon rite aid
online discount pharmacy dotnetblogengine.net coupon for prescription
viagra coupon card free prescription cards discount viagra free coupon
pfizer coupons for viagra free discount prescription cards viagra discounts coupons
pfizer coupons for viagra viagra coupon viagra discounts coupons
1 wk pregnant d&c dilation and curettage article on abortion
can i take escitalopram in the morning link can i take escitalopram in the morning
can i take minocycline with birth control read can i take minocycline with birth control
lisinopril and bisoprolol lisinopril and bisoprolol lisinopril and bisoprolol
cialis coupons from lilly click coupons for prescriptions
venlafaxine gewichtstoename read venlafaxine fk
augmentin générique arbot.cz augmentin sirop
fluvoxamine (luvox) blog.tgworkshop.net fluvoxamina bula
amlodipine 5 mg link amlodipine accord

- Joe Esposito (age 28)
Pittsburgh, PA
A:

Aha, I see what you're wondering about- if some mechanism can be given for the pilot wave force on the particle coordinate in the Bohm picture. maybe some sort of little collisions with local particle fluctations, etc. It's a nice thought, but I think that if anything comes out of an attempt like that it will be even weirder than the view in which the wave function is the sole ingredient. The reason is that all such processes can violate the Bell Inequalities. That means that there is no local picture at all (other than universal conspiracies) that can reproduce the observations. So there's little motivation to pursue yet another local picture.

The emitted photo in a Hawking picture is a real photon, and, like Pinocchio, can do all the things a real photon can do.

Mike W.

hillcrest abortion clinic stories of abortion live abortion video
the best android phone link phone tracking apps
walgreens coupons deals free grocery coupons walgreens photo print coupons
buy sildenafil 100mg buy sildenafil 100mg viagra 100 mg
online discount pharmacy dotnetblogengine.net coupon for prescription
prescriptions coupons go discount coupon for viagra
viagra coupons from manufacturer liberitutti.info drug discount coupons
prescription drugs coupons viagra manufacturer coupon 2016 viagra coupon card
can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone
cialis dosage and cialis dose for copd pts
where buy viagra online side effects from viagra use online viagra buy
cialis price online link cialis price history
cialis coupons from lilly coupon for free cialis coupons for prescriptions
cialis coupon lilly coupons for cialis printable transfer prescription coupon
lilly cialis coupon coupons for prescriptions coupons prescriptions
augmentin générique arbot.cz augmentin sirop
fusidinezuur kopen blog.jp-sa.org fusidic acid
fusidinezuur kopen blog.jp-sa.org fusidic acid
kamagra wikipedia kamagra jelly kamagra shop
flibanserin online click flibanserin buy
cialis cialis discount cialis walgreen coupon
cialis cialis discount cialis walgreen coupon
cialis coupon card coupon prescription cialis coupon
how expensive is an abortion abortion clinic abortion clinics dallas tx
how expensive is an abortion link abortion clinics dallas tx

(published on 01/06/2014)

Follow-Up #4: antiparticles and the two-slit experiment

Q:
Follow up question regarding the double slit experiment. If a photon is it's own anti-particle, does it have something to do with the particle-wave conundrum? I find it very interesting that in the 2 slit experiment, when ever systems are in place to observe witch slit the photon passes through the wave form disappears and becomes only 2 lines, making it impossible to solve. Now with new discoveries in dark matter and dark energy...and also negative energy...dose a dark matter particle have an anti-particle, and can dark energy have a negative form?
why people cheat infidelity signs how many people cheat
hillcrest abortion clinic stories of abortion live abortion video
internet drug coupons site prescription coupon
married men cheat with men open wifes cheat
types of abortions read what happens when you get an abortion
married cheaters redsoctober.com dating for married men
buy sildenafil 100mg viagra without a doctor prescription viagra 100 mg
diprolene kamagra furosemide 40mg
coupons rx prostudiousa.com www.januvia.com coupons
imitrex 50mg thepoliticalsword.com flagyl 200mg
online discount pharmacy viagra coupons and discounts coupon for prescription
viagra coupon card blog.brunothalmann.com viagra free coupon
naproxennatrium site naproxen migraine
venlafaxine gewichtstoename read venlafaxine fk
flibanserin online lasertech.com flibanserin buy
seroquel 25 mg read seroquel debljanje
buscopan hund go buscopan dragees
renovacija stanovanja click renova g
voltaren retard voltaren forte voltaren spray

- Travis (age 39)
Phoenix, AZ, USA
A:

The basic two-slit behavior works the same for particles that are their own antiparticles (e.g. photons) and ones that aren't (e.g. electrons, buckyballs). The particle-like aspect of quantum waves is that they have a "number operator" that gives them something that has discrete integer counts. That also holds for each type of particle. It has a little different behavior for bosons (e.g. photons,  4He) than for fermions (e.g. electrons, 3He), but that is a different distinction than that between ones that are their own antiparticles and ones that aren't.

Mike W.

why people cheat marriage affairs how many people cheat
coupons rx prostudiousa.com www.januvia.com coupons
online discount pharmacy dotnetblogengine.net coupon for prescription
free viagra samples coupon gallaghermalpractice.com viagra 2016 coupon
viagra coupons from manufacturer liberitutti.info drug discount coupons
prescription discount coupons free prescription drug cards viagra discount coupons online
1 wk pregnant d&c dilation and curettage article on abortion
lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks
lisinopril and bisoprolol lisinopriland.net lisinopril and bisoprolol
diabetes affect sexuality diabetes sexuality treatment
acheter viagra pas acheter viagra pas acheter viagra pas
viagra bestellen online viagra pillen kruidvat pillen kopen
cialis manufacturer coupon cialis discounts coupons prescription drug coupons
cialis coupon lilly blog.nvcoin.com transfer prescription coupon
cialis coupon card eblogin.com cialis coupons from manufacturer
drug discount coupons link discount coupons for prescriptions
claritinekombo read claritine za psa
augmentin générique read augmentin sirop
arcoxia 30 click arcoxia wiki
cialis cialis discount cialis walgreen coupon
how expensive is an abortion abortion clinic abortion clinics dallas tx
vivitrol alcohol what is vivitrol shot narcan challenge

(published on 05/20/2014)

Follow-Up #5: What a photon knows, and where it goes.

Q:
QED states that probability of a photon hitting an electron is a square of the sum of amplitudes for all physically possible independent paths a photon could take to reach the detector electron. Amplitude itself for a given energy photon is a vector whose direction essentially depends on just the length of each such path or some imaginary timing required to travel that path. Experiments confirm that it is not possible to tell which path a photon actually takes. Assuming that photon does not actually split into an infinite number of sub-particles each travelling every possible path and reassembles at the detector, here are some conclusions that I would like to falsify by previously done experiments and theories: 1. Every emitted photon knows exactly the location of each electron (and any other particle it interacts with) in the universe and it just hits randomly one of them with some probability according to its relative location with respect to all such particles existing in the universe. 2. Any attempt to detect which path a photon takes does not succeed because detection implies interaction with some particle but the photon already knows the location of the detector particle hence the photon's behaviour changes accordingly. 3. Assuming the above i.e., that each photon somehow knows the location of every particle in the universe, when does it acquire such knowledge: a) at the point of emission? b) or its knowledge about the world is constantly updated as it travels? 4. What about the following version of the double-slit experiment calculate/observe what interference pattern should be by emitting photons one-by-one through the double-slit barrier and onto a detector screen behind it. Then perform the same experiment but keep shifting the double-slit barrier slightly after each photon has been emitted but before it is supposed to go through the slits. Will the interference pattern be exactly the same and in the same location as in the original static version of the experiment or will it be different? 5. If the above experiment produces the same expected interference pattern in both cases it could mean that photon acquires knowledge about all existing particles it interacts with at the point of emission and it doesnt even travel at all. There are just two discrete events: a photon is emitted and then it gets absorbed by a randomly selected particle after some time. The selection of which particle will absorb the photon is performed at the point of emission and the fact that there is a delay between emission and absorption creates an illusion of space travelling which in reality does not happen. 6. If the above experiment produces a shifted interference pattern, at what point does the photon update its knowledge about the world? What if the double-slit barrier is shifted immediately before photon can reach the barrier? I think, it would have been nice if photon did in fact behave like described in point 5, since this could potentially explain many quantum world properties.
why people cheat marriage affairs how many people cheat
cheater what to do when husband cheats wifes who cheat
cheater click wifes who cheat
internet drug coupons site prescription coupon
internet drug coupons coupons for prescription medications prescription coupon
buy sildenafil 100mg buy sildenafil 100mg viagra 100 mg
can i take minocycline with birth control read can i take minocycline with birth control
lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks
acheter viagra pas http://acheterviagraenfrance.com/pas acheter viagra pas
cialis coupons from lilly coupon for free cialis coupons for prescriptions
augmentin générique arbot.cz augmentin sirop
fusidinezuur kopen go fusidic acid
sildenafil pfizer link sildenafil sandoz
fluvoxamine (luvox) open fluvoxamina bula
cefdinir red stool ski-club-auringen.de cefdinir nedir
voltaren retard voltaren pomada voltaren spray
prescriptions coupons emergent-ventures.com drug prescription card
vivitrol alcohol vivitrol implant narcan challenge

- David (age 38)
Reading, UK
A:

Hi David,

It is true that photon amplitudes take all possible paths in an interaction. For example, if you make an interferometer, half of the photon's amplitude goes down each path, and the two amplitudes interfere at the beamsplitter. Most physicists don't try to make statements about the photon's past (beyond saying that it has amplitudes for every possibility), and instead just discuss the outcomes of detector measurements.

That said, you can make some statements, which I believe are true:

1. The photon does NOT have a huge nonlocal database telling it everything about all the other particles in the universe. However, it can have properties which are (nonlocally) correlated to ("entangled with") the other particles that it has interacted with, or that are connected with the chain of events leading to its creation.

2. Attempts to determine which path a particle took can certainly be successful. However, even if such a measurement doesn't destroy the photon, it always collapses the photon amplitudes from "all possible paths" to the measured path, and so limits any further wavelike behavior. (For example, if you put a nondemolition measuring device in one arm of an interferometer, then you won't get the usual interference at the output.) The physical (i.e. classical-sounding) explanation of this effect is that any position measurement transfers random momentum to the particle, which washes out any fringes. (A less classical but more robust description can be made in terms of information: correlations and density matrices.)

3. Since the photon doesn't know about all the other particles, this question doesn't make sense. However, you can ask something similar: if a photon is entangled with a partner particle, and something affects the partner particle, then when does the photon find out? Really, it never "finds out." The relationship between distant entangled particles is not causal, it is just a correlation. The correlation can change without the photon "having any knowledge" about its partner. (See https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=24896.)

4, 5, and 6: The interference pattern you see in any such dynamic experiment will depend only on what configuration the photon saw locally at each point in time. For example, if you emit a photon towards two slits, but yank them out a picosecond before the photon reaches the slits, then you won't get any interference pattern. There isn't anything surprising here, as far as I can think of: the photon really does travel from the source to the detection screen, and the pattern doesn't change if you change something before the photon gets there or after the photon has left. The photon interacts with objects at the same spacetime coordinate, that's all.

Hope that made sense. Let me know if you want further details or explanations, of which there are many.

David Schmid

the best android phone how to spy on cell phones phone tracking apps
the best android phone link phone tracking apps
married woman looking to cheat My wife cheated on me most women cheat
types of abortions the weeks of pregnancy what happens when you get an abortion
walgreens coupons deals site walgreens photo print coupons
married cheaters site dating for married men
free online coupons onlineseoanalyzer.com new prescription coupons
imitrex 50mg site flagyl 200mg
viagra coupons from manufacturer liberitutti.info drug discount coupons
coupons for prescriptions new prescription coupons prescription drugs discount cards
viagra coupon card free prescription cards discount viagra free coupon
1 wk pregnant abortion pill article on abortion
can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone can i take antabuse and naltrexone
lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks lisinopril and energy drinks
lisinopril and bisoprolol lisinopril and bisoprolol lisinopril and bisoprolol
cialis dosage and cialis dose for copd pts
cialis coupons from lilly click coupons for prescriptions
arcoxia 30 arcoxia 90 arcoxia wiki
champix alkohol go champix
diflucan 150 diflucan djelovanje diflucan sirup
seroquel 25 mg read seroquel debljanje
cialis thepoliticalsword.com cialis walgreen coupon
fluvoxamine (luvox) blog.tgworkshop.net fluvoxamina bula
lasix injetavel lasix efeitos colaterais lasix

(published on 06/09/2014)

Follow-up on this answer.