Hi Muhammed,
It doesn't really make sense to ask about the histories of
individual photons. It's not that that's a bad question -- it's
actually a really really good one. It's just that quantum mechanics
insists that answers to questions like that don't exist because you
cannot list the places an individual photon's been and the times it's
been there.
When doing an experiment where a photon interacts with a single
atom or molecule, then a photon behaves as if it is a localized packet
of energy which appears at one place and time. But to examine how a
photon propagates from one place to another, one has to use the wave
description of photons. When an electromagnetic wave impinges on a
mirror, another electromagnetic wave is emitted by the mirror in order
to satisfy the boundary conditions on the surface of the mirror that
the electric field component parallel to the surface of the mirror
vanish. That, and the magnetic field's component pointing into the
mirror must vanish. The only solution to this including an incoming
wave includes also an outgoing wave obeying the usual laws of
reflection. And then the waves can be thought of as probability
functions for finding individual photons.
Actually, balls "reflect" from surfaces too, and in similar ways.
Macroscopic balls do have detailed histories and you can describe where
they are at all times, and they do come to rest before rebounding.
Microscopic objects, like individual atoms, are described better with
the laws of quantum mechanics, and there the incoming and outgoing wave
functions are needed to describe scattering of atoms from solid walls
-- they too exhibit wave-particle duality. It is currently an area of
active research to see how big a system can be and still follow simple
quantum rules like a single atom, and at what sizes and other external
conditions are needed for the more classical description to be
appropriate. I think the current achievement is to get
buckminsterfullerene molecules (round balls made up of 60 carbon atoms
in a symmetrical arrangement) to interfere quantum mechanically with
themselves.
(for our U.S. readers, "torch" = "flashlight")
(published on 10/22/2007)